DIP60: @nogc attribute

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Apr 25 23:00:47 PDT 2014


On 4/25/2014 7:28 AM, bearophile wrote:
> Dicebot:
>
>> It is unacceptable to have code that fails with one compiler and works with
>> the other despite the shared frontend version. Such "enhanced" @nogc
>> attributes must be placed into compiler-specific attribute space and not as a
>> core language feature.
>
> This problem was underlined during this thread far before the merging of the
> @nogc implementation. Why have Walter & Andrei ignored the problem? What's the
> point of creating a DIP if you ignore the problems found in its discussion?
> What's the point of 338 comment posts if Walter goes on anyway with the original
> idea? There are some problems in the D development method that must be addressed.

The @nogc logic is entirely contained in the front end, and is not affected by 
back end logic.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list