DIP61: Add namespaces to D

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Apr 27 01:35:32 PDT 2014


On 4/27/2014 1:16 AM, Andrej Mitrovic via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> There's a need for scoping symbols other than in modules,

What is that need?


> Not unless we have a really solid DIP.

What's wrong with the DIP?


> Idealism aside, modules have some implementation issues right now
> which force people to use workarounds like named mixins or the above
> trick, e.g. package access not being propagated up/down a hierarchy.

??



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list