FYI - mo' work on std.allocator

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 27 April 2014 at 13:10:42 UTC, David Nadlinger wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 April 2014 at 11:13:42 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
>> Also, there is an `expand()` method, but no `shrink()`. Is 
>> that an oversight, or intentional?
>
> If I remember correctly, this was discussed in the initial 
> review of Andrei's proposal (just search the NG for 
> std.allocator).
>
> David

Thanks, found it. The argument was that shrink can not be @safe 
[1], but Andrei wasn't opposed to adding it if desired [2].

[1] 
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/l1nvn4$ca3$1@digitalmars.com?page=1
[2] http://forum.dlang.org/post/l1st99$10ug$1@digitalmars.com