DIP61: redone to do extern(C++,N) syntax

via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Apr 28 07:00:56 PDT 2014


On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 13:47:43 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> Not ok. This is like having 2 definitions for the same 
> function, linker will not accept that.

No. It is like having 2 matching type declarations. The 
implementation is defined in the C++ source code and is 
represented as one C++ object/lib file to the linker. The linker 
will happily accept that.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list