DIP61: redone to do extern(C++,N) syntax

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 28 April 2014 at 14:08:56 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> I see now where your objection is. I think either the rule 
> needs to be better explained, or that it is incorrect.

I think so too, because if my undestanding is correct then it 
will discourage writing libs in mixed D/C++ and encourage writing 
libs in pure C++.

Basically turning D into an application level language (on the 
level of Objective-C so to speak)?