D For A Web Developer

Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Apr 30 05:56:00 PDT 2014


On 4/30/2014 1:24 AM, Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>
> I would say from anecdotal observation, so no real significance, that
> most languages end up with a number of frameworks:
>
> 1A. Full stack Web framework.
> 1B. Lightweight HTTP framework.
> 2A. Full feature networking framework.
> 2B. Lightweight networking framework.
>
> In 1A we have JavaEE, Spring, RoR, Django, Grails, etc. In 2B we have
> Sinatra, Ratpack, Flask, Bottle, etc. For 2A there is Twisted and 2B
> asyncio (showing my Python bias here :-)
>

That does seem to happen.

FWIW, IMO the big selling point of D is it's fairly unique knack for 
letting you eat your cake and still have it. I rather like to think we 
can manage merging the "full stacks" with the "lightweights".



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list