Voting: std.logger

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/1/14, 9:36 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Oh I hadn't realized that. Thanks! That strengthens my opinion that more
> work is needed on the library before inclusion in std.experimental.

To clarify: I'm very strongly opposed to a design that requires 
rebuilding Phobos (or relying on different pre-built versions) for 
different logging levels. That's just unacceptable. User code must be 
able to set logging levels by just passing flags to their own builds.

Andrei