checkedint call removal

Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Aug 1 15:17:15 PDT 2014


On 08/02/2014 12:03 AM, Chris Cain wrote:
> On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 22:01:01 UTC, Timon Gehr wrote:
>> You will notice it uses the word 'assertion' in a way that is
>> incompatible with your claim that the "assert definition" rules out
>> such an usage.
>
> How so? It's an article on evidence. All it seems to suggest is that
> evidence can be used to back up assertions, not that all assertions must
> be backed up by evidence. Assertions are a statement of fact or belief
> and can be backed up with evidence. No incompatibility there.

"contradictory assertions"

"To what degree of certitude must the assertion be supported?"

etc.

I'll not go into more details because I actually intend not to 
participate again in heated debate after already having shown strong 
evidence.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list