assume, assert, enforce, @safe
Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Fri Aug 1 23:08:33 PDT 2014
On 08/02/2014 07:35 AM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/1/2014 7:13 PM, David Bregman wrote:
>> OK, I think I have an idea how to be more convincing (I wish I'd
>> thought of this
>> earlier):
>>
>> is this
>> http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/cassert/assert/
>>
>> the same as this?
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/1b3fsfxw.aspx
>>
>> can you see the difference now?
>
> What I see is Microsoft attempting to bring D's assert semantics into
> C++. :-)
>
Note, regardless of the validity or invalidity of your point:
You evaded the question.
> As I've mentioned before, there is inexorable pressure for this to
> happen, and it will happen.
And when it does happen, criminals will rejoice, right?
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list