assert semantic change proposal

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 21:57:08 UTC, John Carter wrote:
> consequences that reach further than anyone foresees..... but 
> that's OK, because it is fundamentally the correct course of 
> action, it's implications foreseen and unforeseen will be 
> correct.

The implications are foreseen.

Any assert that will depend on any kind of notion of progress 
over time risk blowing up random logic undetected with a decent 
optimizer (> dmd).

But go ahead. This will lead to a fork.