assert semantic change proposal

Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Aug 3 16:05:23 PDT 2014


On 08/04/2014 12:51 AM, John Carter wrote:
> On Sunday, 3 August 2014 at 22:19:16 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
>
>> But go ahead. This will lead to a fork.
>
> What should fork is the two opposing intentions for assert.
>
> They should have two different names and different consequences.

Yes. :)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list