Behaviour of AAs after initialization
via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Aug 7 10:42:28 PDT 2014
On Thursday, 7 August 2014 at 17:35:46 UTC, Puming wrote:
> So I'd like to suggest a rule here similar to what assignment
> does to null AA:
>
> If someone refers to an uninitialized null AA ( in
> implementation, that maybe, a copy of a null AA struct
> happens), allocate it first.
I'm afraid that copying is too general. This would trigger on
just about any access. It would also make copying AAs more
expensive. I believe a standardized method for initializing an AA
is more likely to be accepted.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list