assert semantic change proposal

[Daniel Murphy via Digitalmars-d]

"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d"  wrote in message 
news:mailman.674.1407424873.16021.digitalmars-d at puremagic.com...

> > And we've also got asserts in pre-conditions, which are recoverable by
> > definition.
>
> Huh, what? I thought asserts in pre-conditions are non-recoverable,
> because they imply that user code has broken the contract governing the
> use of that function.

I meant asserts in pre-conditions when used with inheritance.  It's a pass 
if any of the preconditions pass, so the compiler runs them in turn and 
catches all but the last.