proposal: allow 'with(Foo):' in addition to 'with(Foo){..}'

Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Aug 10 11:56:39 PDT 2014


On 08/10/2014 08:34 PM, Era Scarecrow wrote:
>
>   Although I'm not sure how much it adds for complexity to the compiler
> (if any).

It is a trivial change in the parser.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list