Google definitely biased…

[Russel Winder via Digitalmars-d]

On Mon, 2014-08-11 at 08:37 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
> I wouldn't be surprised if there's some manual biasing at work, but I 
> don't think there is.

I don't think we have to consider manual biasing, I think the nature of
the algorithm automatically biases Google sources against any other. The
bias here is I think systemic for reasons completely separate to D and
Go.

It's really annoying though.

The question remains though — for a separate thread I think — are D's
ranges and Go's slices same/similar/analogous/totally different.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20140811/b3c5557f/attachment.sig>