const int vs. int const

[eles via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 15 August 2014 at 18:47:49 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 8/15/2014 10:45 AM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:

> It is not ambiguous from a semantic or syntactic point of view, 
> but it appears to be ambiguous for those coming from C++. This

I like this example from the C world:

http://stackoverflow.com/a/5503661/1284631

But, I agree, I am a follower of the rule:

const is written after and applies to everything that comes left 
of it.