const int vs. int const

bearophile via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Aug 17 11:50:35 PDT 2014


Jonathan M Davis:

> Well, it _does_ follow the language spec, so it's not broken in
> that sense, but it's a broken design IMHO in that it causes
> confusion and bugs, and it has resulted in complaints in the 
> past
> and will continue to do so until it's changed. So, I do think
> that it's true that there will ultimately be fewer complaints if
> we make the change than there will be if we don't.

+1
It's a worthwhile overdue little breaking change.

Bye,
bearophile


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list