Unused variables and bugs

[Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d]

On Sunday, 24 August 2014 at 02:23:11 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 15:48:03 +0000
> Idan Arye via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> How about unused arguments in lambda expressions?
> also, make compiler accept 'auto' in lambdas. i'm sure it 
> should. and
> it should accept 'auto' in foreach(). it should also allow 
> foreach like
> this: foreach (auto, auto; foo).
>
> alas, seems that nobody is interested in this small 
> improvements, and i
> myself neither know fronted internals enough, nor want to write 
> this
> anyway, 'cause patches will just rot in bugzilla.

Currenly foreach does not accept type-without-argument - 
`foreach(int; [1,2,3])` is a compiler error - so that's much 
bigger a change than adding argument-less type inference for 
lambdas.