RFC: std.json sucessor

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 8/25/2014 1:21 PM, "Ola Fosheim Grøstad" 
<ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com>" wrote:
> On Monday, 25 August 2014 at 20:04:10 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad wrote:
>> I think supporting signaling NaN is important for correctness.
>
> It is defined in C++11:
>
> http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/types/numeric_limits/signaling_NaN


I didn't know that. But recall I did implement it in DMC++, and it turned out to 
simply not be useful. I'd be surprised if the new C++ support for it does 
anything worthwhile.