Before we implement SDL package format for DUB

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 10:36:15 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 10:00:29 UTC, ketmar via 
> Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:32:09 +0000
>> eles via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Are the drawbacks of JSON so big? Why to move away from it
>> i don't know too. i think that it's enough to add three 
>> features to
>> current json parser to be happy:
>> 1. comments, both '//' and '/* */.
>
> Not exactly that, but look here two approaches for introducing 
> comments in standard JSON:
>
> 1: a convention
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/a/244858
>
>
> 2: a hack
>
> http://fadefade.com/json-comments.html

These are mostly useful for documentation comments, but not so 
much for disabling parts of the definitions temporarily, which 
would be my primary use case.