Syntactical sugar for string templates and lambdas?

[via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 26 August 2014 at 11:32:58 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
> Apart from the fact that I find this harder to read than simply 
> spelling it out: Backticks are already used for wysiwyg 
> strings. It's almost impossible to reuse them for anything else.

Pretend I use forward-ticks  ´x+´y :-)

What is hard to read depends on what you are used to, but 
declaring symbols to "not be evaluated here" by prefixing them 
with a "tick" seems to carry the semantics better than using 
string mixins and achieve a more concise syntax?