Would you trade 0.1% in performance for a better debugging experience?

[Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d]

On 11/18/2014 06:00 PM, Marco Leise wrote:
> Without fully understanding the issue, omitting the frame
> pointer on GNU amd64 systems is the default and is supposed to
> work using DWARF debug information. So there should be no need
> for a stack frame pointer, right?
>
> Are you mostly concerned with Windows then?

Agreed we should stick to the platform ABI, then tooling won't be a problem.
So indeed this seems to be more of a Windows specific problem.

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235286.aspx#sectionToggle2
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2kxx5t2c.aspx