Do everything in Java…

ketmar via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sat Dec 6 00:36:18 PST 2014


On Sat, 06 Dec 2014 07:54:32 +0000
Paulo Pinto via Digitalmars-d <digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:

> On Saturday, 6 December 2014 at 01:31:59 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> > On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 20:43:03 UTC, paulo pinto wrote:
> >> On Friday, 5 December 2014 at 20:25:49 UTC, Walter Bright 
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 12/5/2014 1:27 AM, Paulo Pinto wrote:
> >>>> Just because code has tests, doesn't mean the tests are 
> >>>> testing what they
> >>>> should. But if they reach the magical percentage number then 
> >>>> everyone is happy.
> >>>
> >>> I write unit tests with the goal of exercising every line of 
> >>> code. While one can argue that that doesn't really test what 
> >>> the code is supposed to be doing, my experience is that high 
> >>> coverage percentages strongly correlate with few problems 
> >>> down the road.
> >>
> >> I imagine you haven't seen unit tests written by off-shore 
> >> contractors....
> >>
> >> For example, you can have coverage without asserts.
> >
> > Code review my friend. Nothing gets in without review, and as
> > won't usually don't enjoy the prospect of having to fix the shit
> > of a coworker, one ensure that coworker wrote proper tests.
> 
> Good luck making that work in companies.
> 
> Code review is something for open source projects and agile 
> conferences.
hm. i should tell my mates that our company with 100+ employers from
several countries is doing something wrong, as no code can be commited
here without review...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20141206/fd978b1d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list