DIP69: problem with scope grammar - need a new keyword

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/8/2014 1:52 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 09:46:03 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I thought I could make this work, but it's a problem. There are two meanings
>> for scope when attached to a function:
>>
>>     T func() scope;   // the 'this' pointer is 'scope'
>>     scope T func();   // the function returns a 'scope' T
>>
>> I have some ideas, but don't particularly like any of them. But I don't want
>> to bias things, so what ideas do you guys have?
>
> I'm arguing for ages that qualifier before the return type qualify the return
> type, and the one after the implicit argument. I stand by this.

Another problem with that is:

   void func(scope T delegate() dg);