DIP69: problem with scope grammar - need a new keyword

[Mathias LANG via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 09:52:02 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> I'm arguing for ages that qualifier before the return type 
> qualify the return type, and the one after the implicit 
> argument. I stand by this.

Simple (== easy to remember), and already widely used. I agree.
In addition, for the possibly ambiguous cases with delegates, a 
compiler warning could be emitted.