problem with size_t and an easy solution

[Messenger via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:31:50 UTC, ketmar via
Digitalmars-d wrote:

>> Personally, when I face the need for a size_t, I usually can 
>> (and do) use auto instead.  And even if I have to spell it, I 
>> don't care too much how it's called, only whether it can be 
>> easily recognized.
> i bet that "woobooAAARGH" will be even easier to recognize than
> "size_t". as there is no other types in D with "_t" suffix, you 
> have to
> remember that anyway, so it doesn't really matter which one to
> remember. ;-)

brb aliasing