problem with size_t and an easy solution

Gary Willoughby via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Dec 9 08:55:22 PST 2014


On Tuesday, 9 December 2014 at 16:10:10 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> p.s. just out of curiousity: why do you need it? D int types has
> well-defined size, so i can't see any sense in using C leftover.

I'm doing lots of pointer arithmetic so i've used uintptr_t in 
various places.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list