DIP69 - Implement scope for escape proof references

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 07:48:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> I don't see how this is related. It would be perfectly ok to 
>> declare root of
>> such tree scope if it was transitive (as long as it only 
>> controls access and
>> does not attempt early destruction).
>
> Are you suggesting two kinds of scope - transitive and 
> non-transitive?
>
> The more I think about it, the more ref counting is the 
> definitive case, as just about everything else can be explained 
> in terms of how ref counting works.

I don't see applicability of non-transitive scope because I don't 
understand the problem with the tree or reference counting you 
have mentioned - that is why I suggested to amend DIP to put 
explanation there.