DIP69 - Implement scope for escape proof references

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/12/2014 12:16 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Friday, 12 December 2014 at 07:48:21 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
>> Are you suggesting two kinds of scope - transitive and non-transitive?
>>
>
> Non transitive scope can be added without any language extension.

In order for it to work, the holes in the language that enabled escapes had to 
be plugged. That's what this proposal does - plug the holes.


> ref counting is just one form of ownership.

My point is if that works with this proposal, then the other forms can work, too.