i want my bounty!

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 at 17:50:24 UTC, Nick Treleaven 
wrote:
> On 15/12/2014 19:39, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
>> If you put your git repo online somewhere, I wouldn't mind 
>> pulling from
>> it and pushing to Phobos as PRs. It's much more convenient than
>> downloading patches off bugzilla. (Git was designed to be used 
>> this way
>> in the first place!)
>
> +1, it really would be much more attractive than patches. That 
> way we can see the code easily in a browser, the developer can 
> split work into commits, the reviewer(s) can easily fetch it. 
> Submitters need to make it easy to start reviewing their code 
> (especially if they don't want to use github). Patches are much 
> harder to apply after time has passed - a git branch can be 
> rebased, clearly showing each conflict encountered.

This is pretty much it. If you don't want to use GitHub you need 
to provide an alternative way of time-efficient code review. I 
remember checking few ketmar patches attached in bugzilla before 
with an intent to resubmit those to GitHub but after seeing no 
tests included and several style / implementation issues I have 
decided to simply not bother with it.