What is the D plan's to become a used language?

[Vic via Digitalmars-d]

I assume in order for your company to be happy in using D, you'd 
want it work, right? That is all I'm saying as well, lots of git 
examples and commercial projects using D.
And I'm not saying to remove *any* features at all. I'm saying 
*MOVE* some features, tbd. For example Linux has Kernal and GNU, 
who cares where in git they sit, right? (but GNU needs a working 
Kernal).

The example I linked(do you have it?) is like a more 
modern/younger language GO has exceptions. Or w/ GC, DI/IOC a 
'generic' GC that makes you happy. But it does not make you sad 
to have an eco system, right?

Anyway, you have to hear maintainers start saying/doing things to 
make things more maintainable before you can worry, since I am 
not a committer my opinions ads up to 0 basically in open source 
world. (if I was, I'd fork it until 'CW' catches up and backports 
it).

Vic


On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 01:08:00 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
> NO. Just don't use features that you don't understand or like, 
> but
> don't punish happy D users by demanding a crippled D version.
>
>
> On Sunday, 21 December 2014 at 22:21:21 UTC, Vic wrote:
>> ...