DIP69 - Implement scope for escape proof references
Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Dec 21 19:06:56 PST 2014
On 12/21/2014 2:06 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> No, it is exactly the other way around. The very point of what I am saying is
> that you DOESN'T CARE about ownership as long as worst case scenario is
> assumed. I have zero idea why you identify it is conflating as ownership when
> it is explicitly designed to be distinct.
The point of transitive scoping would be if the root owned the data reachable
through the root.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list