cross post hn: (Rust) _ _ without GC

[Vic via Digitalmars-d]

On Monday, 22 December 2014 at 22:02:46 UTC, ketmar via 
Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 12:28:16 +0000
. what we really need is a
> better GC,
> not "no GC".

I am not saying no GC; I am saying:
a) something needs to be moved out of core. If not GC, what would 
you move downstream?

b) move, not remove. So you can plug in any gc implementation you 
like - the current GC if you still like it.
Like linux kernal needs gnu to do 'cd'.

hth,
Vic