DIP66 has been approved contingent to a few amendments as noted

[eles via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:54:24 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:16:32 UTC, eles wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 12:59:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 15:49:46 UTC, Andrei 
>>> Alexandrescu wrote:

> What would be the point of it? D1 is almost absolutely inferior 
> to D2 (both compiler and language) and lacks any better tools 
> recently created by the community.

I do not contest that. But will be a less-deceiving entry-point 
for those that are new to the language, they will bite and would 
wish to see more...

And it would relieve time pressure on the current D2 development, 
that thrives to be both innovative and production-ready at the 
same time.

D2 is still looking for the best design. D1 has one, is not as 
good, but is a safer default.

Anyway, I do not push for it.