Lost a new commercial user this week :(

[Manu via Digitalmars-d]

On 26 December 2014 at 11:11, Kiith-Sa via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d at puremagic.com> wrote:
>
>> Finally, contracts are overwhelming, and it's also a feature of D that
>> nobody has seen before. When someone new to D encounters a contract in
>> the docs, they no longer trust their ability to usefully interpret the
>> documentation, and almost certainly become confused; nobody expects to
>> see an 'if' statement in a function declaration.
>> I think that's a shame. The contract usually has no impact on using
>> the function, or how it should be understood, is just applies some
>> limitations to it's genericity.
>> I think contracts should be disconnected and listed separately, as
>> additional information, or with some subtext that makes it obvious
>> what that often confusing bit of text actually means.
>>
>> Ironically, the string and algorithm functions are probably the worst
>> offenders, but coincidentally, there is a high chance that these are
>> the first functions anyone will ever reach for, so they present a
>> terrible first impression.
>
>
> I think you mean constraints, not contracts.

Sorry, you're absolutely correct >_<