DIP66 has been approved contingent to a few amendments as noted

[newbe via Digitalmars-d]

yes - please resurrect D1!!!!!!!!!!!

+100



On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 13:16:32 UTC, eles wrote:
> On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 12:59:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 15:49:46 UTC, Andrei 
>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>
>> resolution. How about providing it as a separate compiler build
>
> I feel like dropping D1 was not such a good move. Especially if 
> full ABI compatibility with D2, people could have chose to 
> write some of the less critical modules of their software in D2 
> (along with the enthusiasm of discovery), while still having a 
> stable&non-experimental compiler for the really critical things.
>
> Then, D1 would have become D1.5 by integrating the D2 
> time-proven features etc., just as D2 could become D2.5.
>
> Is too late (or undesired) to resurrect D1 in maintenance mode? 
> It is a bit strange that one of the most successful stories of 
> D (Sociomantic) uses D1, still the compiler is ignored and 
> everybody seems pretending that is a D (D2) success story.