DIP66 has been approved contingent to a few amendments as noted
Tobias Pankrath via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Sun Dec 28 15:05:27 PST 2014
On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 at 22:12:02 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 12/24/14 4:59 AM, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 23 December 2014 at 15:49:46 UTC, Andrei
>> Alexandrescu wrote:
>>> Congratulations, Igor! -- Andrei
>>
>> Good to see that.
>>
>> It is a big feature though with a notable impact on symbol
>> resolution.
>> How about providing it as a separate compiler build for a
>> release or two
>> before deploying as part of master?
>
> An emerging pattern (which Walter will effect for dip69) is to
> initially make it opt-in as a flag:
>
> dip -dip69 test.d
>
>
> Andrei
Where breaking changes are self-contained in a separate
compilation sense, I'd rather have a pragma that effects the hole
module.
Especially changes that prohibit currently allowed code could be
incorporated bit by bit.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list