const Propagation
Julian Kranz via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Mon Dec 29 07:36:57 PST 2014
On Monday, 29 December 2014 at 15:25:13 UTC, Daniel Kozak wrote:
> On Monday, 29 December 2014 at 15:17:30 UTC, Julian Kranz wrote:
>> Thank you for your answers. All of your suggestions go into
>> the right direction, however there's still one thing left that
>> breakes it: the method itself (blah()) needs to be marked as
>> const to be callable on a const object. Therefore, I need
>> something like
>>
>> void blah(...)(...) if(this ia const object) const : nothing {
>> }
>>
>
> Did you try my solutions? It doesn`t need blah to be const
Uuuhm, you're right, it works :-D I don't completely understand
why the compiler does not require the function to be sonst any
longer...
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list