Worst Phobos documentation evar!

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/29/2014 10:34 AM, jklp wrote:
> I like your sense of the compromise. DDoc is mostly usefull to generate the doc
> as html but inside the sources, it's often **unreadable**. I think that you know
> that documentation comments as markdow would be good but maybe you're scared
> because of the consequences implied when rendering dlang.org std reference and
> such things.
> And if both could live together ?
>
> If I had the power to do this, DDoc would be primilarly 'markdown' with
> optionally html and macros things allowed.

I don't care much for hybrids, they are confusing and ugly.