Nicer anchors

[Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 30 December 2014 at 04:27:33 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> appealing, and that is frustration. After all _anyone_ 
> concerned with the state of ddox could check for themselves in 
> less than a minute by attempting to build the docs. The 
> irritation pattern that seems to be present in this group as of 
> late only invites more of it.

Well, to fix something, one would first need to know that it's 
broken. (It would take me more than a minute to check as I don't 
use dub or have it installed.)

> The better route out of this is to kindly invite contributors 
> who added ddox support, and all others who are interested, to 
> improve ddox build to the point of making it robustly usable. I 
> trust you are out there reading this. Thanks.

I think you are entirely right in that such issues should be 
resolved not by D project leaders, but delegated to Dub/DDox 
maintainers. But we should be aware of possible communication 
issues regarding in whose court the ball is at the moment.

I've filed an issue, hope this helps:

https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/ddox/issues/69