Nicer anchors

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d]

On 12/30/14 8:59 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> On 30/12/2014 02:18, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure using numbers to distinguish overloads is a good idea. Such
>> links would break easily.
>
> Note: that isn't part of Andrei's pull.

Yah, I was surprised when I saw'em.

> Using numbers is the only workable way, other schemes would also break
> easily, probably moreso. I implemented it so that ditto overloads don't
> get a separate number, to avoid some breakage when adding dittos.

Agreed. I think the best solution is to simply group overloads together. 
They already do related things in any given module, so consolidating 
documentation makes sense anyway.


Andrei