Nicer anchors

H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Dec 30 10:29:06 PST 2014


On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 09:55:17AM -0800, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On 12/30/14 8:59 AM, Nick Treleaven wrote:
> >On 30/12/2014 02:18, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> >>
> >>I'm not sure using numbers to distinguish overloads is a good idea. Such
> >>links would break easily.
> >
> >Note: that isn't part of Andrei's pull.
> 
> Yah, I was surprised when I saw'em.
> 
> >Using numbers is the only workable way, other schemes would also break
> >easily, probably moreso. I implemented it so that ditto overloads don't
> >get a separate number, to avoid some breakage when adding dittos.
> 
> Agreed. I think the best solution is to simply group overloads together.
> They already do related things in any given module, so consolidating
> documentation makes sense anyway.
[...]

Note that consolidating docs for overloads doesn't work as well as it
should, due to:

	https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13270


T

-- 
Customer support: the art of getting your clients to pay for your own incompetence.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list