Smart pointers instead of GC?

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 2/2/14, 2:53 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> On Sunday, 2 February 2014 at 07:35:21 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> No.
>>
>> What I'm driving at is that right now the type is A, as is in a
>> variety of other situations. It would be a whole different language
>> that would be wholly incompatible with D.
>
> What do you think about my `scope` proposal?

I think that's more likely to be made to work.

Andrei