Smart pointers instead of GC?

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Mon Feb 3 20:26:22 PST 2014


On 2/3/2014 8:17 PM, Michel Fortin wrote:
> That's not the case for nullable.

Yes, it is. If the function accepts a pointer to S and returns a pointer to S.f, 
then a null pointer in means a null pointer out, and a completely different type.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list