Idea #1 on integrating RC with GC

[Manu]

On 6 February 2014 02:16, Dicebot <public at dicebot.lv> wrote:

> On Wednesday, 5 February 2014 at 16:13:33 UTC, Manu wrote:
>
>> Huh? Why would they? They don't create cycles, and would clean up
>> reliably.
>>
>
> Because they still return T* and not RC!T ? Andrei's post speaks purely
> about extra library type and does not mention about possibility to make it
> default allocation type for language.
>
> Or it is just silently assumed?
>

Dunno, but I don't think any solution which uses RC!T will ever be
acceptable. It basically defeats the whole purpose.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20140206/9b26fbe5/attachment.html>