"alias that this" or "alias this : that"

[Timon Gehr]

On 02/07/2014 11:23 PM, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
>>
>
> Reserving `alias this = ...;` allows adding aliasing of constructors in
> the future, assuming it can be meaningfully defined.

What a mess that would be. If the consensus is that alias this syntax 
was a mistake then _both_ forms should be removed and the concept should 
be re-introduced as specially named member instead.