Testing some singleton implementations

[Martin Nowak]

On 02/07/2014 06:10 PM, Stanislav Blinov wrote:
> On Friday, 7 February 2014 at 16:57:50 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
> --8<--
>
> On strongly-ordered systems (x86, SPARC, IBM mainframe), release-acquire
> ordering is automatic for the majority of operations. No additional CPU
> instructions are issued for this synchronization mode, only certain
> compiler optimizations are affected (e.g. the compiler is prohibited
> from moving non-atomic stores past the atomic store-release or perform
> non-atomic loads earlier than the atomic load-acquire)
>
> -->8--

So, who is going to fix core.atomic?