Phobos for Review: std.buffer.scopebuffer

[Dicebot]

On Sunday, 9 February 2014 at 12:30:56 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> * Could we put this in a more general package, like 
> std.memory.buffer.scopebuffer. Then the upcoming std.allocator 
> could be placed in std.memory.allocator

I don't like "buffer" as a package name at all. Probably better 
approach is to put it in same package with Appender and make it 
common package for all standard output range implementations.

Its relation to std.allocator is just a (desired) implementation 
detail.