Phobos for Review: std.buffer.scopebuffer

[Walter Bright]

On 2/9/2014 12:43 PM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:

> 1. I guess there is a distinctive quality to a buffer (i.e. it's not just any
> output range). The current interface looks quite arbitrary - is 'pop' required
> for any buffer?

No, pop isn't required.

> A trait like isBuffer is in order, to allow user code to target
> any buffers including non-Phobos ones.

I don't understand the point of this suggestion.

> 2. May need buffer.package.d to import all common buffers (there is only one
> now, but with time...).

I do not like the idea of "kitchen sink" importing. The package.d thing was 
designed so that we can split up the existing kitchen sink modules without 
breaking user code.