Idea #1 on integrating RC with GC

Ola Fosheim Grøstad" <ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com> Ola Fosheim Grøstad" <ola.fosheim.grostad+dlang at gmail.com>
Mon Feb 10 15:12:24 PST 2014


On Monday, 10 February 2014 at 23:06:56 UTC, Xavier Bigand wrote:
> ????
> So in these case I will forget D, and cry all the tears of my 
> body. It will just a shame for a system language.
> And it's certainly kind of applications actually miss for D, to 
> improve his visibility.

Yes, but nobody that are in the "decision making body" of D has 
shown any resemblance of understanding or priority for real time 
applications. Seriously, the language is close to ten years in 
the making.

> Just take a look around you all applications are interactive, 
> with more animations,...

Yeah, but at some point you just have to accept that people who 
don't have a need to write real time will avoid putting it on the 
road map.

I would like to see a roadmap that says "real time" and "no gc" 
and "whole program optimization", "owned pointers", "shared 
pointers"++

I see no road map.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list